Skip navigation


lehman25

In aceste zile am fost ocupati cu melodramele maimutelor rosiatice si am uitat doua chestii spuse cu subiect si predicat:

“Luni la orele 19 basescu semneaza decretul prezidential de numire al lui Puiu Hassoti in functia de ministru al culturii si cultelor sau pleca . Dar o sa semneze fara sa crasneasca si o semneze ca notaru” !!!

“La Brussel pleaca primministrul Ponta. basescu NU pleaca “

In rest o bila neagra la tentativa de numire al lu` elvis fosta sluguta basista in functia de primteverist si o mica constatare fata de de poll-ul anterior – Prea il vedeti smecher pe jeg, e doar un golan batran !

25 Comments

  1. eu vreau sa stiu de ce nu a plans?

    • Chioru plange doar la comanda, ala de da comanda are probleme…

      • aha.
        salveaza lacrimile cand va fute poporul la referendum.

  2. mai am o intrebare: elwis asta este tigan?rom?indian?nativ asiatic?
    stie cineva?

  3. Asa graita Zarathustra…🙂

  4. ps
    Lehmann
    please sa te corectezi:
    elwis sluguta basista s-a inscris cu W nu cu V.
    (cum dealtfel este corect).😉

  5. Banuiesc ca te referi la conceperea acestui specimen !🙂

  6. “i-a dorit sufletelul sa i-l pun pe barba-su sef la Sie, i l-am pus!” Traian Basescu

  7. @ Kn: Mai ţii minte, dragule … o discuţie despre asigurările de sănătate … la care ne-am cam împotmolit … la faza de principii ?

    Iote, io urmăresc îndeaproape … reforma sănătăţii a lu Obama … ce a mai trecut azi un hop … de contestarea la Curtea Supremă:
    In a victory for President Barack Obama, the Supreme Court upheld his signature health care law’s individual insurance mandate in a 5-4 decision, upending speculation after hostile-seeming oral arguments in March that the justices would overturn the law. The mandate has been upheld as a tax, with Chief Justice John Roberts, a Bush appointee, joining the liberal wing of the court to save the law.

    [Have questions about today’s Supreme Court ruling upholding the health care individual mandate? Join us for a live Facebook chat at 4 p.m. ET ]

    In brief comments Thursday afternoon, Obama called the decision a win for Americans. “With today’s announcement it is time for us to move forward to implement and, where necessary, to improve this law,” he said. Mitt Romney told reporters shortly before noon that he would repeal the law his first day in office if elected. “ObamaCare was bad policy yesterday, it’s bad policy today,” he said.

    The court’s four liberal justices agreed that the individual mandate should be upheld as part of Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce, but Roberts disagreed, and wrote that the mandate is actually a tax, despite the Obama administration’s reluctance to describe it that way during the bill’s passage. In its argument to the court, the government left open the possibility that the mandate is a tax, but did not rely much on that argument. Under the law, people who do not have health insurance will have to pay 1 percent of their income to the IRS starting in 2014. (There are exceptions for some religious beliefs and financial hardship.)

    “If an individual does not maintain health insurance, the only consequence is that he must make an additional payment to the IRS when he pays his taxes,” Roberts writes. He adds that this means “the mandate is not a legal command to buy insurance. Rather, it makes going without insurance just another thing the government taxes, like buying gasoline or earning an income.”

    A footnote flagged by SCOTUSblog’s Amy Howe explains the reasoning further. “Those subject to the individual mandate may lawfully forgo health insurance and pay higher taxes, or buy health insurance and pay lower taxes. The only thing that they may not lawfully do is not buy health insurance and not pay the resulting tax.”

    Justice Anthony Kennedy, usually the court’s swing vote, dissented, reading from the bench that he and three conservative justices believe “the entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety.” In a 65-page dissent, he and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dismissed Roberts’ arguments, writing that there is a “mountain of evidence” that the mandate is not a tax. “To say that the individual mandate merely imposes a tax is not to interpret the statute but to rewrite it,” they wrote.

    Twenty six states sued over the law, arguing that the individual mandate, which requires people to buy health insurance or face a fine starting in 2014, was unconstitutional. Opponents cast the individual mandate as the government forcing Americans to enter a market and buy a product against their will, while the government countered that the law was only regulating a market that everyone is already in, since almost everyone will seek health care at some point in his or her life.

    Before oral arguments in March, most Supreme Court experts and scholars believed the mandate would be upheld as an exercise of Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce. But after justices seemed deeply skeptical of the mandate in oral arguments in March, the consensus flipped, with most experts guessing the court would strike down the law.

    House Republicans have vowed to repeal the entire law, though it’s unlikely the Democratic-controlled Senate would let that happen, and this decision may slow momentum for that move. “Today’s ruling underscores the urgency of repealing this harmful law in its entirety,” House Speaker John Boehner said in a statement.

    Seven of the nine justices agreed that the law’s expansion of Medicaid to an estimated 16 million low-income people by 2019 is unconstitutional as it was written. The court decided that the federal government cannot threaten to withdraw existing Medicaid funds from states if they don’t expand Medicaid. Instead, the government can only withhold future funds. It’s unclear if that will mean fewer than the 16 million projected will gain coverage.

    Dacă ai timp … şi eşti mai informat ca mine … poate displicăm un pic reforma asta alu nenea Obama … s-o înţăleg şi io mai bine … şi, cine ştie … poate găsim idei … ce ar putea fi aplicate … de guvernarea USL … şi la noi😉

  8. greu.
    US are un sistem de asig med si social security cam greoi si …poate dezolant daca privim din prisma sociala.
    medicare,este un program ptr seniori(peste 65).
    medicaid este ptr negrii si un numar infim de albi, asiatici,altii.(90% sunt negrii fara nici o calificare inafara “bipedismului”)
    pe urma vin asigurarile regulare .adica a celor ce muncesc si platesc la o firma de asigurari privata.
    si avem si cca 50 milioane(asa zice fratele meu) de neasigurati.us gov zice ca sunt 35 de milioane….
    si avem platinium…hehehe🙂
    la asig private poti alege paleta de beneficii med(bineinteles ca nu ai all inclusiv)…in afara de dentist.care este extra.
    🙂

  9. sa inteleg ca tu esti interesat de “medbabby obama”.
    medicaid…
    care cica i-i va trece…
    el vrea sa “transfere un numar mare din neasigurati in medicaid”.programul asta este finantat exclusiv din taxe colectate de la productivi.(angajati +angajatori) nu stiu exact cat este taxa…banuiesc ca este in jur de 6 % …la care adauca 1.47 ptr medicare plus asigurarea normala ….
    fuck! zic americanii.🙂
    la fel ar zice si romanii…😦

  10. acum,
    sistemul asta al lor a fost foarte bun(cat timp au avut industria acasa ,mare generatoare de locuri de munca)
    a fost un sistem cladit pe “bunastare productiva”.pe mare incredere in forte proprii si in sistem.
    pe american dream.care era realizabil.
    (fratele meu a plecat din ro in ’79.in de a stat 6 luni.a continuat spre us.visul lui.doar cu o diploma in romana,si cu 1000 de us $in buzunar.acum i-si traieste visul.e ce se spune plastic:realizat.dar munceste de 15 ori mai mult ca mine si astazi)
    sistemul lor a fost bun,cum spun,canaliza oamenii spre bunastare prin munca si alte realizari profesorale….
    acum scartaie.din cauza somajului.care daca ne luam dupa zvonuri este in jur de 25%.
    (e foarte ampla discutia…si nu mai are rost…ptr ca este un trecut)

  11. medicaid.
    la noi.🙂
    pai noi avem medicaid din 90 incoace cat casa!!!!
    americanii ar rosii de invidie daca ar stii!!!!🙂🙂🙂🙂
    glumesc.
    din datele(atatea cate putem culege) casa noastra de sanatate are 17 mil de asigurati.
    pensionari,minori,paturi defavorizate (tarani,someri,”socialii”,tigani,etc),budgetari(care contribuie la casa dar din budgetul insumat din taxe colectate),si o BRUMA de contribuabili din sectorul economiei reale.
    (nu te incarc cu procentajul…dar poti sa-l gasesti usor pe web-ul casei)
    un coleg de’al meu zice:3 pe 1,ness cafe laffesta.
    si asa…ar merge.patetic…dar ar merge…
    dar aici trebuie sa adaugi un agent patogen care umbla liber si face ravagii lent dar letal.
    si anume industria farmaceutica.si daca asta ar fii singura…dar nu e.are soata.industria tehnici med si a consumabilelor.
    aici sufar eu de scarba.

  12. acum,
    socialistii zic:conditia de homosapiens impune :venit minim garantat,educatie,ingrijire med,beneficiara de acte juridice(am auzit ca daca esti “fara venit” nu platesti taxe de timbru la judecata),benefiar de serviciile acordate de org de ordine,etc..(nu le stiu pe toate)…sunt o groaza de servicii de care beneficiezi in statul social fara sa aduci IN NICI UN FEL O MINIMA contributie.
    obama zice la fel.el este un fel de psdist american…🙂🙂🙂🙂
    la ora asta …eu ,personal,nu cred ca este realizabil statul social asa cum i-l cunoastem.cred a e depasit.
    poate functiona daca cei doi poli se mentin in cotele existente.(saracii si bogatii).stim ca nu este asa.saracia creste masiv.
    iar vectorul de pace,patura medie este conectata la aparate.mentinuta artificial in viata.
    si asa se duce dracu sistemul.ce traim noi astazi …sunt ultimele lui zvacniri.
    parerea mea.

    • Înţeleg. Cu ce mi-ai displicat acu’ … ş’cu ce mai înţelesesem io … sunt lămurit. Merci, dragule.🙂

      • nu stiu daca am reusit ceva sa “displic”.🙂🙂🙂
        of,
        cand “citesc” acest dulce grai…ma duc cu gandul in tinerete…
        am fost si am ramas un simpatizant.🙂

  13. ps
    lumea zice…ca obama beneficiaza de un credit ptr alegeri.
    acest medicaid.
    dar tot aceasi lume zice ca dupa alegeri(daca ar castiga) d-l obama va fii nevoit sa comita o “pruncucidere”..😦
    problema este ca masa de oameni nu va realiza “manevra” decat la faptul implinit…
    urat.

    in lumea medicala…la ora asta,opinile sunt impartite in 2 tabere.
    1 zice :in curand nu vom mai avea nevoie de medici.(tehnologia)
    2 zice:fiecare medic ar trebuii sa faca o specializare In medicina de “combat”…si poate o scurta specializare in “babologie”…🙂🙂🙂
    pe cine sa crezi?

    • Mi-a plăcut cum ai zis … Obama … pesedist🙂

      Ciudăţel, cumva … fin’că are faţă de … liberal😀

      Iar Romney … dimpotrivă … are moacă de pesedist🙂

      • 🙂
        hm
        pai nu esti “departe’…
        cu moaca lui obama…el este defapt “liberall”.
        politica liberala nu este neaparat o politica de “dreapta” ca la noi…
        este mai mult “central stangista”…🙂🙂🙂
        de acolo si…”meserii liberale”(medici,profesori,artisti)
        (barem asa a fost in anii de aur 60-80)
        cat despre mormon…are o fata tipica de utah.de predicator scortos.
        din aia ce considera ca homosexualitatea se poate vindeca prin bataita.
        crima suprema este avortul.
        daca nu “crezi” in zeciuiala esti taman nascut ptr ghena.
        etc.
        nu-i invidiez deloc pe americani.in noiembrie vor alege intre doua rele definite.😦

        • Mda, după cum îl descrii tu … Romney pare a avea strămoşi … inchizitori🙂

  14. afara din cotroceni javra ordinara marss pe nava sub apa basinescu chiorule care te-ai batut joc de TARA ROMANEASCA , de toata populatia romana.


Iti "base" mintea? Baga!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: